Skip to content
UXMachine

UXMachine · Public beta

Know what to change first — and what to verify before acting.

UXMachine analyses a public page, separates observed evidence from interpretation, and turns friction signals into a clearer decision.

Analyse my page →See two real readings ↓

No account required. Public pages only.

Two real pages. Two different kinds of value.

Factorial shows a safe fix and an honest limit. Calendly shows how UXMachine can identify what needs verification before changing an intentional set of options.

Independent readings of public pages. Not clients, endorsements or commissioned audits. Websites change.

Factorial homepage hero: 'The business software to manage your whole team' with an email sign-up, a 'Get Started' button, a 'Start product tour' link and product mockups.

Factorial

Usable reading with caveats

A clear first fix: 26 images carry no alt text.

Evidence

26 images on the page have no alt attribute.

What to review first

Which single action should lead the hero. The reading counts 12 plausible actions in the first viewport with no clear winner, so it holds back from ranking them until the page's intended primary action is confirmed.

What not to conclude yet

The reading does not claim which action is primary — it counts the competition and holds back. Treat the action-priority question as something to confirm against the page's intent, not a settled call.

Real reading summarised from a UXMachine run. Reading captured on 2026-07-15. Sites change.

Open full Factorial reading →
Calendly homepage hero: 'Easy scheduling ahead' with a booking-page mockup and sign-up options.

Calendly

Clean reading

A focused hero that still ships three competing sign-up paths.

Evidence

Three primary and two secondary calls to action above the fold.

What to review first

Whether one primary sign-up path should visually dominate the other two.

What not to conclude yet

This is one reading. Offering multiple sign-up methods can be intentional; the note is about their equal visual weight, not their presence.

Real reading summarised from a UXMachine run. Reading captured on 2026-07-09. Sites change.

Open full Calendly reading →

A decision, its evidence and its limits.

  • What to change first

    A prioritised action when the observable evidence is sufficient.

  • What to verify

    Signals that matter but need context before changing the interface.

  • What UXMachine cannot conclude

    Explicit limits instead of confident-sounding guesses.

What should your page make easier?

Run an evidence-first reading on a public URL.

Analyse my page →

No account required.